The clauses that decide where the parties stand when a dispute arrives: governing law, jurisdiction, liability limits and termination.
Commercial contracts are drafted when the parties agree and read when they fall out. The clauses that look like detail at signature are the ones that decide where each side stands when performance stops. This article sets out what Qatar's Civil Code provides on those questions, because much of it applies without being written into the contract at all — and some of it cannot be contracted out of.
Binding force, and its limits
Article 171 of the Civil Code provides that a contract is the law of the parties: it may not be revoked or altered except by agreement of both parties or for reasons laid down by law. That is the premise on which all drafting rests.
The second paragraph of the same article introduces an important exception: where exceptional general events occur that could not have been foreseen, and as a result performance of the contractual obligation — though not impossible — becomes so onerous for the obligor as to threaten exorbitant loss, the judge may, according to the circumstances and after weighing the interests of both parties, reduce the onerous obligation to a reasonable extent. And the provision adds that any agreement to the contrary is void.
This is a point often missed in drafting: a clause placing the entire risk of changed circumstances on one party does not displace that judicial power, because the provision voids an agreement to the contrary.
Good faith, and terms you did not write
Article 172 requires a contract to be performed in accordance with its provisions and in a manner consistent with the requirements of good faith. A contract does not bind a party only to what it says: it also covers whatever is required by law, customary practice and justice, according to the nature of the obligation.
The practical consequence is that detailed drafting does not close the door entirely: ancillary obligations not expressly stated may still be read into the contract where law or custom makes them part of what it requires. That is a reason to define scope of work precisely rather than rely on general language.
Termination and rescission
In contracts binding on both parties, where one party fails to perform, the other may — upon formal notice — demand performance or rescission, together with damages for the loss caused. The judge may grant the obligor a period of grace, and may also reject an application for rescission where the unperformed obligation is insignificant compared with the obligations taken as a whole (Article 183).
The parties may agree that the contract shall be deemed rescinded automatically, without a court order, on a failure to perform. Such an agreement does not limit the judge's authority to terminate unless the wording expressly shows that to be the parties' mutual intention. Article 184 adds that, other than in commercial transactions, an agreement for automatic rescission does not dispense with formal notice.
That distinction between commercial and other transactions is worth noting at the drafting stage, because it changes what must be done before a party relies on an automatic-rescission clause.
Force majeure and impossibility
In contracts binding on one party, where performance becomes impossible through force majeure beyond the obligor's control, the contract terminates automatically; where the impossibility is partial, the obligee may enforce the contract so far as performance remains possible (Article 187). In contracts binding on both parties, the impossible obligation and its correlative obligations are extinguished and the contract is rescinded by operation of law; on partial impossibility the obligee may either enforce what remains possible or demand termination (Article 188).
The parties may agree that the obligor bears the risk of force majeure or an unforeseen event (Article 258). Contractual allocation of that risk is therefore possible — but it requires express words, not inference.
Limiting liability, and what cannot be excluded
Liability for non-performance of a contractual obligation, or for delay in performing it, may be excluded by agreement — except where it arises from the obligor's fraud or gross fault. Liability for the fraud or gross fault of persons the obligor employs in performance may also be excluded by agreement. Any agreement made before liability in tort arises, which would exclude it wholly or partly, is void (Article 259).
That reads together with Article 170: doubt is interpreted in favour of the obligor, and where a contract contains a clause discharging a party from liability, it is construed narrowly. A limitation-of-liability clause drafted in broad terms may therefore be read more narrowly than the party who inserted it intended.
The court may reduce the damages, or award none, where the obligee's own fault contributed to or increased the damage (Article 257). And damages are not due until the obligor has been given formal notice, unless the parties agree or the law provides otherwise (Article 260).
In contracts binding on both parties, where corresponding obligations are due, either party may decline to perform if the other fails to perform, unless the parties agree otherwise or accepted practice provides otherwise (Article 191).
Governing law and the dispute mechanism
The governing law and dispute-resolution clauses are what give the rest of the contract its practical value: together they decide who will read the contract and by which rules. They need to be consistent with one another — choosing one State's law alongside a forum elsewhere can produce a result neither party intended.
Arbitration in civil and commercial matters in Qatar is governed by dedicated legislation, and the procedural position varies with the framework that applies and with what the parties agreed; the procedural position in force should be confirmed against the official text before it is relied on. That choice is examined in litigation or arbitration in Qatar.
For a practical pre-signature review, see the legal checklist before signing a commercial agreement. Where the agreement is for building or engineering works, the Civil Code adds provisions specific to contracting — see disputes on construction and property projects. Our contracts team and corporate and commercial practice advise on drafting and reviewing commercial contracts.
Key takeaways
- Under Article 171 of the Civil Code a contract binds the parties and may be revoked or altered only by mutual consent or for reasons provided by law.
- But Article 171 also lets the judge reduce an obligation to a reasonable extent where exceptional, unforeseeable general events make performance excessively onerous — and any agreement to the contrary is void.
- A contract must be performed according to its provisions and consistently with good faith, extending to what law, custom and justice require (Article 172).
- Liability for non-performance or delay may be excluded by agreement, except where it arises from fraud or gross fault (Article 259).
- Doubt is interpreted in favour of the obligor, and a clause discharging a party from liability is construed narrowly (Article 170).
Legal references
Al Meezan — Qatary Legal Portal


